Foreword:
by Richard L. Allington,
Ph.D.
University of Florida
Every now and then I’ll
pick up a book and wonder, “Why
didn’t
I think of that?”
Margaret Mooney’s small
book is just that sort of text. In
one source she has provided a virtual
compendium of those
features of texts that we seem often simply to take for
granted. And in taking them for granted we may
underestimate
the complexity
that texts can create for
readers, for emerging
readers especially.
But while this book draws
our attention to these common but
overlooked features of different sorts of
texts, Mooney is quite
clear that the text itself is but one of three
aspects of a
literacy lesson. She argues that first teachers must know their
students. Know them well as developing readers and writers.
Know their
interests and preferences as well as how far they
have traveled along the
literacy continuum. Second, teachers
must know the curriculum. Know what
things are important to
teach. What sort of proficiencies is the appropriate
focus of the
instruction? Then third, teachers must know the texts that
children will experience. It is this third focus that is the primary
topic
of this text.
Mooney provides a new set
of eyes for knowing the texts that
students encounter. Knowing the texts
means that a range of
opportunities for teaching open up. Opportunities that
support
students as they work through texts. Opportunities that result
in
more children learning to manage increasingly complex
texts. Opportunities
to assist children as they ponder and
explore how texts accomplish so many
and varied things.
Mooney reminds us that
for too long guided reading lessons
have overemphasized fictional narratives
and
underemphasized different kinds of texts, including maps,
directions,
magazines, and, of course, informational texts
(including traditional
content area textbooks). She sets out in
a straightforward manner the sorts
of features that
differentiate different types of texts. Along the way she
discusses features that are common to all texts (e.g., fonts
and type size),
but features that are too often not explained
to
children.
She argues that in
thinking about the texts to be used in
instruction we need to remember that
the key issue is “not
what I can use the book to teach…but what the book
offers the
reader in terms of content, understanding about texts, and
the
role of the reader…” As she walks us through a variety of
texts,
she
illustrates just this way of thinking about
instructional
opportunities.
My hunch is that this
book is a good candidate for an annual
rereading, just before the school
year begins anew. It will
continue to remind us of the breadth of
instructional
possibilities with most any text. It will remind us that good
teaching doesn’t assume anything. Remind us of the power we
hold as teachers
in developing children who can and do,
joyously and voluntarily, read and
write.
Richard L. Allington,
Ph.D.
University of Florida